Subcribe to our RSS feeds Join Us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Add to Circles


The Color Line (HIS 204 Assignment)



            After the Civil War had ended, millions of ethnic minorities had expected racial equality on par with their white counterparts.  Much to their chagrin, the racial issues that had plagued them before the war continued right on and into the new century.  Even the men of color who fought and whose fellow brothers in arms died for the Union Army were thrust back into pre-war prejudices that they had sacrificed so much to be rid of.  The millions of immigrants who entered America over the course of a few decades were also subject to this way of life.  How could a country, founded on the basis of equality, be so unjust?
            Ideas and beliefs on racial inequalities have existed for centuries.  Whether it’s skin color or ideological, the fact of the matter is that when people recognize their differences sometimes hatred follows.  It could be fear of the unknown or it could be just plain ignorance.  Much of it is passed down through the generations and taught to children by their parents.  We are not born racist; that is a trait learned.
            Much had been done over the course of America’s short history to prove that our doctrine really only applied to white men.  Such statements as “all men are created equal” were great on paper but our nation was, and in some ways still is, rife with inequality.  Ethnic minorities had nowhere near the same treatment in the socio-political/economical stage.
            Laws and policies were enacted to keep the appearance of equality, all while asserting white dominance.  In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination (Smithsonian, n.d.).  This ruling opened the floodgates for education centers and workplaces to segregate the people while on the surface appearing to be about racial equality.  In truth, the whites earned much more than their black counterparts.  They were also promoted faster and received the choicest positions – which in turn created a racial black-hole in which white people would look after white people.
            Schoolchildren were exposed to this blatant racism, which only served to further educate them in matters of social injustice.  They saw that the non-white children were less educated, more poor, and their families much lower on the social ladder.  After a while this attitude became the status quo.  If it has always been that way, then it must be right… right?  That’s how a child’s mind works – and that’s how a good majority of adult minds were functioning.
            In the big cities such as New York, where immigration was a very big issue, racial segregation was as blatant as it was accepted.  Immigrants were pouring in.  Many were stuffed into new housing developments called “tenements.”  Jacob Riis says this of the tenements in his book ‘How the Other Side Lives:’ “Their large rooms were partitioned into several smallerones, without regard to light or ventilation…and they soon became filled from cellar to garret with a class of tenantry living from hand to mouth…and thus the dark bedroom, prolific of untold depravities, came into this world (Riis, 1890).  These tenements solved the problem of where to house all the immigrants – at the cost of even the most basic tenets of human dignity.
            The primary inhabitants of these tenements were Italian, Irish, and German immigrants.  The “native” white people had moved out of the metro area and into more plush and comfortable settings in the countryside.  This left their old domiciles open for the land-lords to cut into smaller chunks and cram as many people inside as possible at a mark-up in rent.  It was common to think that these immigrants came from worse and would easily adapt to any circumstance set before them.  This view started turning these immigrants into a sort of sub-human character in the public eye: good for labor, but only if kept out of sight.
            It took many decades to right the wrongs of the late 1800s/early 1900s.  Slowly, as the public became aware (or finally admitted to the problem), new laws were put into effect that paved the way for social equality.  By the 1950s, schools were integrating.  New worker’s laws made fair and equal treatment amongst all employees regardless of color or background.  But even to this day, the memory of this inequality is still there; a scar amongst many scars that America’s short life bears.  It will take many more generations to put aside differences and treat each other like equals.  Even today, there’s inequality; however subtle it may be.  Perhaps someday soon, race will not even be a topic of debate. 

References

Smithsonian National Museum of American History (n.d.). Separate but equal: The law of the land. Retrieved from http://americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/separate-but-equal.html
Riis, J. A. (1890). How the other half lives: Studies among the tenements of New York. Charles Scribner's Sons. doi:10.1037/12986-000
 

No comments:

Post a Comment